In|Sync Overall Results

In the end, the only thing that matters with a proposed solution is if it actually works. Independent validation studies all agree on one thing: In|Sync makes communities safer, healthier, and faster all across the states.
-0%
Stops

-0%
Delay

-0%
Travel-Time

-0%
Emissions

-0%
Fuel Consumption
-0%
Accidents

Read the studies

Community


Source

Reduced


Stops

Reduced


Delay

Reduced


Travel Time

Reduced


Fuel Consumption

Reduced


Emissions

Increased


Average Speed

Annual Savings


to Motorists

Henderson, NV


Ludian, 2021

53%

34%

16.3%

N/A

5%

20%

$10.3 Million

Maricopa County, AZ


AECOM, 2019

N/A

51%

11.5%

N/A

N/A

10%

$25,900

Lewisburg, PA


Pennoni Associates Inc., 2018

58%

N/A

41%

N/A

N/A

94%

N/A

Longmont, CO


CDOT, CO, 2018

41%

52%

22%

6%

N/A

27%

$5.8M

Columbia Cty, GA


Columbia County, GA, 2012

71%

72%

29%

15%

20%

54%

$2.9M

Springdale, AR


City of Springdale, AR, 2010

88%

79%

35%

19%

28%

56%

$5.1M

State of Virginia


VCTIR, 2015

68%

N/A

37%

39%

N/A

59%

$33.4M

Topeka, KS


City of Topeka, KS, 2011

73%

67%

41%

27%

32%

73%

$2.1M
Read More...

Columbia, MO


MoDOT, MO, 2010

74%

58%

20%

N/A

N/A

25%

$1.9M

Farmingtion, NM


AECOM, 2015

64%

39%

14%

N/A

N/A

N/A

$1.1M

Greeley, CO


Atkins, 2012

43%

25%

10%

4%

N/A

12%

$1.3M

Lee’s Summit, MO


MRIGlobal, 2010

73%

59%

23%

10%

19%

27%

N/A

Mountain View, CA


TJKM Transportation Consultants, 2016

40%

39%

28%

N/A

N/A

54%

N/A

Mt. Pleasant, SC


HDR, 2011

58%

56%

23%

N/A

N/A

25%

N/A

Pinnelas Cty, FL


Transportation Institute, UF, 2017

N/A

21%

16%

N/A

N/A

13%

N/A

Salinas, CA


TJKM Transportation Consultants, 2011

66%

72%

42%

N/A

N/A

70%

$1.7M

San Diego, CA


Urban Systems Associates, Inc., 2014

59%

N/A

17

27%

N/A

17%

N/A

San Ramon, CA


DKS Associates, 2010

45%

45%

25%

16%

38%

N/A

$1.3M

Miami-Dade County, FL


FIU, 2019

N/A

11.8%

7.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Upper Merion, PA


PennoniAssociates, 2010

23%

32%

26%

N/A

N/A

39%

795,000

Volusia Cty, FL


Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, PE, and Milan Zlatkovic, PhD, 2012

9%

18%

18%

N/A

N/A

5%

N/A

Washington Cty, OR


Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2012

N/A

N/A

20%

39%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Wauwatosa, WI


TranSmart Technologies, Inc., 2013

32%

28%

10%

N/A

N/A

N/A

$1.3M

Wichita, KS


City of Wichita, KS, 2011

83%

66%

29%

21%

30%

45%

$975,000

Hillsboro, OR


Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2012

N/A

9%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A
Close
In|Sync offers unmatched value and is versatile enough to handle virtually any situation.
It is proven to reduce accidents, decrease fuel use, improve travel time and save drivers money.
GIVE ME ACCESS
Download Catalog

Featured Case Studies

In|Sync has a lasting impact on the lives of communities all across the nation. From reducing congestion and delay to improving air quality and travel experience — In|Sync solves it all.

1
Digitize Operations
Having a digital architecture, In|Sync can invoke any state of parallel green phases as needed.

Instead of relying on pre-set cycle lengths with tedious transition times, like most traffic signal synchronization methods, In|Sync uses a finite-state machine to digitize operations.
Image
2
Local Optimization
In|Sync uses a rule-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm, The Greedy Algorithm, to synchronize vehicle demand with green durations at the intersection in real-time.

In|Sync allocates a token for every unique car that joins the queue and an additional token for every 5 seconds a car waits.

The Greedy Algorithm changes the traffic signal light status to minimize the number of tokens issued, producing unparalleled results in the field.
3
Global Optimization
In|Sync coordinates between traffic signals without increasing side street delay using a concept called “Time Tunnels.”

Time tunnels are created throughout the corridor in real time, with the slope of the tunnel indicating the speed of travel between traffic signals.

The green durations for various phases are based on the Greedy Algorithm, and the time-between-tunnels can vary as well.

Watch Video

Image
Colorado DOT, City of Greeley
Watch Case Study
"We have seen a clear improvement in traffic flow, and we anticipate a significant reduction in crashes. Thanks for a job well done."
Donald DeBerry, PE
City Transportation Engineer Lynchburg, VA
Image
TOPEKA, KS
Watch Case Study
"With In|Sync we achieved 24% reduction in crashes."
Linda Voss, PE
Traffic Engineer (fmr)|Topeka, KS
Image
Columbia County, Georgia
Watch Case Study
“It’s like having several traffic engineers on staff.”
Glen Bollinger, IMSA3
Program Manager
Image
Colorado DOT, City of Greeley
Watch Case Study
“Everybody thinks we did a really good job using the In|Sync system.”
Eric Bracke, PE, PTOE
City Traffic Engineer (fmr) Greeley, CO
Image
West Des Moines, IA
Watch Case Study
“It’s real time! When you have an influx of traffic, it takes care of that traffic immediately.”
Jim Dickinson, PE
Principal Traffic Engineer|West Des Moines, IA
Image
San Diego, CA
Watch Case Study
“The installation of these new adaptive traffic signals means less time spent on the road and more time for commuters to spend with their families. Residents are catching more green lights than ever before and the community is thrilled about it.”
Lorie Zapf
City Council Member San Diego, CA
Image
VDOT
Case Study
Donald DeBerry, PE
City Transportation Engineer (fmr)
Lynchburg, VA
"We have seen a clear improvement in traffic flow, and we anticipate a significant reduction in crashes. Thanks for a job well done."
Image
West Des Moines, IA
Case Study
Jim Dickinson, PE
Principal Traffic Engineer
West Des Moines, IA
“It’s real time! When you have an influx of traffic, it takes care of that traffic immediately.”
Image
San Diego, CA
Case Study
Lorie Zapf
City Council Member
San Diego, CA
“The installation of these new adaptive traffic signals means less time spent on the road and more time for commuters to spend with their families. Residents are catching more green lights than ever before and the community is thrilled about it.”
Image
VDOT
Case Study
Donald DeBerry, PE
City Transportation Engineer (fmr)
Lynchburg, VA
"We have seen a clear improvement in traffic flow, and we anticipate a significant reduction in crashes. Thanks for a job well done."
Image
West Des Moines, IA
Case Study
Jim Dickinson, PE
Principal Traffic Engineer
West Des Moines, IA
“It’s real time! When you have an influx of traffic, it takes care of that traffic immediately.”
Image
San Diego, CA
Case Study
Lorie Zapf
City Council Member
San Diego, CA
“The installation of these new adaptive traffic signals means less time spent on the road and more time for commuters to spend with their families. Residents are catching more green lights than ever before and the community is thrilled about it.”
Image
Colorado DOT, City of Greeley
Case Study
Eric Bracke, PE, PTOE
City Traffic Engineer (fmr) Greeley, CO
“Everybody thinks we did a really good job using the In|Sync system.”
Image
Topeka, KS
Case Study
Linda Voss, PE
Traffic Engineer (fmr) Topeka, KS
"With In|Sync we achieved 24% reduction in crashes."
Image
Columbia County, Georgia
Case Study
Glen Bollinger, IMSA3
Program Manager
“It’s like having several traffic engineers on staff.”
Image
Colorado DOT, City of Greeley
Case Study
Eric Bracke, PE, PTOE
City Traffic Engineer (fmr) Greeley, CO
“Everybody thinks we did a really good job using the In|Sync system.”
Image
Topeka, KS
Case Study
Linda Voss, PE
Traffic Engineer (fmr) Topeka, KS
"With In|Sync we achieved 24% reduction in crashes."
Image
Columbia County, Georgia
Case Study
Glen Bollinger, IMSA3
Program Manager
“It’s like having several traffic engineers on staff.”

Independent Validation Studies

The improvements communities see when using the In|Sync traffic bot are well-documented
in multiple validation studies.

Maricopa County, AZ
Read The Study
Reduced delay and congestion during special events and holidays.
Longmont, CO
Read The Study
Reduced pollutant emissions and wasted costs in the form of travel time and delay.
Upper Merion, PA
Read The Study
Provided lower travel times and less delay, while clearing queues for the side street approaches.
Washington County, OR
Read The Study
Improved vehicle travel time on the corridor and increased percentage of arrival on green.
Mountain View, CA
Read The Study
Reduced traffic congestion and increased average speed.
See All Studies

Client Testimonials

“Unlike older technologies, In|Sync can adjust to immediate changes in traffic...In|Sync looks at exactly what is currently happening and immediately adjusts to an unexpected change in traffic. It's impressive to see how quickly the system adapts."
Bill Henry, PE
Traffic Engineering Manager
Little Rock, AR
“The results of their equipment is instant. The minute you turn it on the results are there.”
Matt Schlachter, PE
Deputy County Administrator, Construction & Maintenance
Columbia County, GA
"Any time you call them, they are there to help and guide you step-by-step."
Charles DeVitis, IMSA3
Traffic Signal Supervisor
Upper Merion Township, PA
"In|Sync is like having several (extra) traffic engineers on staff."
Glen Bollinger, IMSA3
Traffic Engineer (fmr)
Augusta, GA
“This technology is different than any other system operating today. It addresses limitations and deficiencies that nearly every traffic control system has. For a long time, traffic engineers have been hoping for a significant innovation in traffic control and here it is."
Matt Selinger, PE, PTOE
HDR, Inc.
"Tomorrow's technology is here today, so let's see what it can do. In|Sync has proved to be something worth your time and investment."
Larry Haas, PE
Traffic Operations Engineer (fmr)
CDOT
"They were there every step of the way in telling us what we would need. They were incredibly helpful in working with the different vendors."
Eric Bracke, PE, PTOE
City Traffic Engineer (fmr)
Greeley, CO